Most playdates start with good intentions — and, if you’re lucky, enough snacks to keep things calm. Drama escalates when children argue, someone feels left out, or behaviour crops up that you’d never normally allow in your own home.
I’ve always thought the word “playdate” makes the whole arrangement sound far more civilised than it often is. Two children are going to play nicely together while the adults perhaps enjoy a cup of coffee, or at least that’s the theory. In practice, somebody inevitably wants the exact toy the other child is holding, the rules of a game become fiercely disputed and a perfectly pleasant afternoon can unravel over something as insignificant as who gets the blue cup.
The temptation is to step in immediately, particularly when the disagreement is happening in your home. We want everyone to have a lovely time, nobody to go home upset and, if we’re being completely truthful, no awkward message from another parent later asking what happened. However, children disagreeing isn’t necessarily evidence that a playdate has gone wrong.
Children need opportunities to negotiate, compromise and work through ordinary conflict without an adult solving every problem for them. If we intervene the moment voices become slightly louder, we’re often taking away the very experience that helps them learn how friendships work. Sometimes waiting for a minute before getting involved is enough for children to reach a solution we hadn’t expected.
Of course, there is a point where adults should intervene. Physical aggression, deliberate cruelty, persistent exclusion or behaviour that leaves another child genuinely distressed shouldn’t be dismissed as children simply sorting things out. The challenge is learning to distinguish between an uncomfortable but ordinary disagreement and a situation where somebody needs adult support.
Then there’s the particularly awkward issue of another child’s behaviour in your home. Most of us are comfortable correcting our own children, but telling somebody else’s child not to jump on the furniture or throw toys across the room can suddenly make perfectly confident adults remarkably hesitant. I think the answer is simpler than we sometimes make it: your home can still have rules, regardless of whose child is visiting.
Those boundaries don’t need to become a judgement on somebody else’s parenting. A calm “We don’t throw toys in this house” is very different from telling a child they’re badly behaved. Clear expectations usually create less tension than quietly becoming increasingly irritated while hoping somebody else notices what’s happening.
I also don’t believe every playdate needs a post-match analysis. If two children disagreed, resolved it and carried on playing, we don’t necessarily need to turn it into a lengthy conversation afterwards. Children often move past minor arguments much faster than adults do, particularly when we resist the urge to assign blame.
More importantly, not every friendship is going to work. Sometimes children simply don’t get along particularly well, despite their parents liking each other or our hopes that they’ll become best friends. That’s not a failure, and repeatedly arranging playdates in the hope that they’ll eventually click can create more tension than friendship.
Perhaps successful playdates aren’t the ones where nobody argues. They’re the ones where children get the chance to practise being friends, including navigating the occasional disagreement, while knowing an adult is nearby if things genuinely get out of hand.
Our job doesn’t have to be keeping every moment peaceful. Sometimes it’s simply knowing when to step in and, just as importantly, when to stay out of it.
Disclaimer: This article reflects the writer’s views and is for general information only.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Screen time without battles is possible when families replace hard stops with a simple, predictable swap kids can accept.









